The rear seats themselves are fitted to runners and so can be slid forward or back by 250mm depending on whether you need knee room or load capacity, which is a Renault touch dating from the Twingo and later adopted by Volkswagen for the T-Cross.Īdults fit comfortably in the back row, so for growing families with teenagers the Captur is a sensible choice. Practicality is altogether more impressive – on some versions the seat covers can be removed to be washed and there’s a good sized 377-litre boot, expandable to 1,235 litres if you fold the rear seats.
#RENAULT CAPTUR 0 9 PLUS#
On the plus side, everything feels durable and right down to minor switches – but it would be nice to see a bit more pizazz. Delving a little deeper reveals that the choice of materials isn’t exactly plush, with hard plastics used throughout instead of the soft-touch material in rival cars like the Peugeot 2008 (and the later VW T-Cross). It’s smartly laid out, with easy to read, clear dials and a nice big digital speedometer. The cabin of the Captur makes a good first impression. On the inside of an Renault Captur (2013 – 2019) If you're looking for the newer version, you need our Renault Captur review. Standard equipment is good which, combined with reasonable pricing, makes the Captur a good choice for families and arguably the best car in Renault’s range.įrom February 2019, Renault replaced the old 1.2 TCe 120 engines with the new Renault/Nissan/Mercedes/Dacia 1,332cc TCe 130 and TCe 150 giving a very welcome power boost.Ĭonstantly improved throughout its model life, the Renault Captur laid the ground for small crossovers and even at the end, in 2019, still compared well with latecomers such as the SEAT Arona and VW T-Cross. The Captur manages to deliver the stylish looks and the elevated driving position that make small crossovers so popular, coupled with efficient engines, good road manners and a practical cabin. Similarly the seat upholstery isn’t the thickest or softest, but it’s not a huge problem – not least because the seat covers of some model grades (not the leather seats of the GT Line) can be removed and cleaned. It feels fairly durable, but it would be nice to see the plusher, soft touch material you get in rivals like the Peugeot 2008. The original choice of cabin materials wasn't the best – most surfaces are finished in hard plastic. More important is the fuel economy – even the least efficient model in the Captur range - the 1.2-litre automatic - manages more than 50mpg while the impressive 1.5 dCi returns a claimed 76.4mpg. None is particularly powerful but even the entry-level 0.9-litre TCE petrol does a good enough job of moving the car around and getting up to speed. Running costs are relatively low thanks to a range of three frugal engines – two petrol and one diesel. Interior space impresses too – the boot is big enough for trips away and thanks to a sliding rear bench, rear seat passengers should be able to get comfortable even if they’re adults. The Captur is compact and drives like an everyday hatchback, with light controls and precise handling, but it also has the advantage of a raised driving position that affords good visibility. It's a good alternative to an MPV and it's a stylish design too, although it has been replaced by a newer model. The resulting data is purely informative, our website cannot be held responsible.The Captur is Renault's small crossover and is based on the Clio, but it’s more practical than its hatchback counterpart and thanks to competitive pricing, it represents a good value buy for the family buyer.
The average statistics of the data submitted by usersĮstimated data may vary compared to its real (actual) values.algorithm recalculates the real consumption values according to coefficients of statistics and factors below: Although there is no certainty of the content, it is for informational purposes only. Estimated fuel consumption data, depends on the users driving style, environmental conditions and may vary depending on many factors. Therefore, the estimated fuel consumption data may vary compared to the actual real fuel consumption data. Our improved algorithm coefficients were calculated for each model particularly. The estimated fuel consumption is calculated by the statistical information acquired as a result of hundreds of submitted user’s data, and driving by professionals including the vehicle's engine class, vehicle weight, fuel type, transmission type, depending on factors such as road conditions. While reviewing vehicles, the actual data should be considered as real fuel consumption. These data were compiled from sources published by the official and nonofficial websites and catalogues of brands and companies.
Actual fuel consumption for vehicles is specified in 'Factory data' table.
0 kommentar(er)
